• You have just completed making several figures illustrating a series of your experiments.

    • using the ratio-metric Ca+2-sensitive fluorophore Fura-2

  • measure changes in cytosolic Ca+2 during receptor-mediated activation of lacrimal gland cells

  • But unfortunately you have misplaced the information concerning when chemicals were added to the bathing solutions

  • But you do remember that methacholine is a muscarinic cholinergic receptor agonist

  • You plan to enlist the help of your N&P Study Group to refresh your memory by using their combined physio-logic.

  • The List of Chemicals Used Was :

    • methacholine ( MeCh )

      • muscarinic receptor agonist

      • stimulates Gq-coupled receptors , leading to IP3-mediated calcium release from ER

    • atropine ( Atr )

      • muscarinic receptor antagonist

      • blocks MeCh's effect by preventing receptor activation

    • inositol triphosphate ( IP3 )

      • second messenger that binds to IP₃ receptors on the ER ,

        • causing Ca²⁺ release into the cytoplasm

    • Ca+2

    • La+3

      • Ca²⁺ channel blocker

      • used to inhibit store-operated Ca²⁺ entry ( SOCE ) across the plasma membrane

    • thapsigargin ( TSG )

      • SERCA pump inhibitor

      • which blocks ER Ca²⁺ reuptake ,

        • causing ER Ca²⁺ depletion and activation of SOCE

    • EGTA

      • A Ca²⁺ chelator

      • high selectivity for Ca²⁺ over Mg²⁺

      • used to buffer extracellular Ca²⁺ and limit its effects

    • ionomysin ( Iono )

      • calcium ionophore that facilitates Ca²⁺ transport across membranes ,

        • raising intracellular Ca²⁺ levels independently of receptors

    • heparin

      • used intracellularly as an IP₃ receptor antagonist ,

        • blocking Ca²⁺ release from the ER by preventing IP₃ binding

image-20250402074228097

Fig. 1. Methacholine (MeCh)-induced Ca++ release and Ca++ influx
  1. In Figure 1A , the additions at time points a through d were either extracellular Ca+2 or EGTA for traces 1 through 3. Time c was an addition to trace 2 , and time d was an addition to trace 3. Provide the best choices for each time point.

    • Initial Spike = intracellular calcium

    • Plateau = extracellular calcium

    image-20250402082636562

Extracellular Ca+2 was present during only some of the traces in Figure 1A. ( ok )

  1. In Figure 1B , the same chemical was added to each trace ( at the points indicated by arrows ). Was extracellular Ca+2 present ?

    • yes , extracellular was present

    • there is still a sustained plateau after the initial spike

    image-20250402082747698


image-20250402074626540

Fig. 2. Thapsigargin (TSG)-induced Ca++ release and Ca++ influx
  1. In Figure 2 the additions at points a , b , and c were either Ca+2 or EGTA. Provide the best choices for each time point

    • Time-Point-A = calcium added

    • Time-Point-B = EGTA added

    • Time-Point-C = extracellular calcium added

  2. In Figure 2A , a specific TSG concentration ( 0.0 ; 0.01 ; 0.03 ; 0.3 ; 0.7 ; or 1.0 µM ) was added for each trace , 1 through 6. Match each concentration to the trace number.

    • blocking calcium export , results in high levels of intracellular calcium

    • Trace 1 = 1.0 µM

    • Trace 2 = 0.7 µM

    • Trace 3 = 0.3 µM

    • Trace 4 = 0.03 µM

    • Trace 5 = 0.01 µM

    • Trace 6 = 0.0 µM

      • calcium wasn't depleted , so ORI never reached out to STIM

        • it only connects if calcium is low in the ER

  3. In Figure 2A , the TSG-induced Ca+2 response of trace 4 must have been smaller and slower than those in traces 1 through 3 for a reason. Convince your group what was going on. What evidence supports whether complete ER Ca+2 depletion occurred ?

    • TSG is a SERCA pump inhibitor

      • so calcium is never removed from cytosol and stored in ER

    • Trace 4 we thought had lower amount of TSG ( 0.03 µM ) ,

      • so its not going to inhibit SERCA pump

      • therefore , there should be very little intracellular calcium

    • So even though it has slower kinetics , when we added calcium back in at Time-Point-A , we see a significant calcium level increase ( SOCE )

  4. In Figure 2B , predict the level of Ca+2 influx for traces 1 , 3 , and 4. Also predict if the extracellular Ca+2 concentration had been increased to 3 mM at time point c.

    • Trace 1 and 2 = no influx

    • Trace 3 = small influx

    • Trace 4 = moderate influx

    • If you added extra extracellular calcium at Time-Point-C ,

      • then trace 2 would take a very long time to return to baseline

      • trace 6 would also plateau more , instead of declining


image-20250402075055222

Fig. 3. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca++ stores accessible to MeCh and TSG
  1. In Figure 3A-B , match the TSG concentration ( 0.0 , 0.015 , 0.03 , 1.0 µM ) with traces 1 through 4

    • Panel A :

      • Trace 1 = 1.0 µM

      • Trace 2 = 0.03 µM

      • Trace 3 = 0.015 µM

      • Trace 4 = 0.0 µM

    • Panel B :

      • Trace 1 = 1.0 µM

      • Trace 2 = 0.03 µM

      • Trace 3 = 0.015 µM

  2. In Figure 3A , what caused the response to extracellular Ca+2 in trace 4 to be smaller than these last responses seen in traces 1 through 3 ?

    • Trace 4 had zero TSG

      • so ER calcium stores were never depleted

        • therefore STIM / ORAI were never activated

    • so even after adding extracellular calcium , there is little flux

  3. In Figure 3B , what caused the amplitudes of the MeCh-induced Ca+2 responses to differ despite the same MeCh concentration being added ?

    • High amounts of TSG ➡️ fully deplete ER calcium ➡️ no calcium left for MeCH to release

    • Low amounts of TSG ➡️ ER calcium available ➡️ MeCH response


image-20250402075353428

Fig. 4. Dual actions of La+++ on MeCh-induced and TSG-induced Ca++ responses.
  1. How does La+3 influence Ca+2 flux into and out of a cell ?

    • La+3 :

      • blocks calcium influx by competing with calcium entry

      • slows calcium efflux by inhibiting PMCAs

  2. In Figure 4A , in which traces was La+3 present? Rank order these traces from the lowest to highest La+3 concentration ( 0.0 , 0.03 , 0.2 , 0.5 µM )

    • Trace 1 = 0.0 µM || Zero [ La+3 ]

    • Trace 2 = 0.03 µM || Lowest [ La+3 ]

    • Trace 3 = 0.2 µM || Intermediate [ La+3 ]

    • Trace 4 = 0.5 µM || Highest [ La+3 ]

  3. In Figure 4A , what caused traces 3 and 4 to have slower Ca+2 decay phases than trace 2 ?

    • the high amount of [ La+3 ] inhibits PMCAs

      • reducing calcium export

        • this exaggerates the plateau on the trace

  4. In Figure 4B , what caused the observed response in trace 2 to addition of 2 mM Ca+2 ?

    • La+3 is still around and is blocking STIM / ORAI channels

  5. In Figure 4C , what led to the difference in the responses for traces 1 through 3 when La+3 was added at different points along the time course ?

    • the earlier they add La+3 , the more effective / time it has to block internal calcium release

    • when they add it at the later times , calcium has more of a chance to exit internal storage locations

  6. In Figure 4C , predict the Ca+2 response if La+3 is added at points a and b

    • Time-Point-A :

      • La+3 blocks SOCE , and it looks like Trace 1

    • Time-Point-B :

      • SOCE is partially blocked still , so it looks more like Trace 3