How is a concentration gradient of protons transformed into ATP? We have seen that electron transfer releases, and the proton-motive force conserves, more than enough free energy (about 190 kJ) per “mole” of electron pairs to drive the formation of a mole of ATP, which requires about 50 kJ (p. 480). Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation therefore poses no thermodynamic problem. But what is the chemical mechanism that couples proton flux with phosphorylation?
In the Chemiosmotic Model, Oxidation and Phosphorylation Are Obligately Coupled
The chemiosmotic model, proposed by Peter Mitchell, is the paradigm for energy coupling. According to the model (Fig. 19-19), the electrochemical energy inherent in the difference in proton concentration and the separation of charge across the inner mitochondrial membrane — the proton-motive force — drives the synthesis of ATP as protons flow passively back into the matrix through a proton pore in ATP synthase. To emphasize this crucial role of the proton-motive force, the equation for ATP synthesis is sometimes written
(19-10)
Mitchell used the term “chemiosmotic” to describe enzymatic reactions that involve, simultaneously, a chemical reaction and a transport process, and the overall process is sometimes referred to as “chemiosmotic coupling.” Here, “coupling” refers to the obligate connection between mitochondrial ATP synthesis and electron flow through the respiratory chain; neither of the two processes can proceed without the other. The operational definition of coupling is shown in Figure 19-20. When isolated mitochondria are suspended in a buffer containing ADP, , and an oxidizable substrate such as succinate, three easily measured processes occur: (1) the substrate is oxidized (succinate yields fumarate), (2) is consumed, and (3) ATP is synthesized. Oxygen consumption and ATP synthesis depend on the presence of an oxidizable substrate (succinate in this case) as well as ADP and .
Because substrate oxidation drives ATP synthesis, inhibitors of electron transfer block ATP synthesis (Fig. 19-20a). The converse is also true: inhibition of ATP synthesis blocks electron transfer in intact mitochondria. When isolated mitochondria are given and oxidizable substrates, but not ADP (Fig. 19-20b), no ATP synthesis can occur and electron transfer to does not proceed. Henry Lardy, who pioneered the use of antibiotics to explore mitochondrial function, showed coupling of oxidation and phosphorylation by using oligomycin and venturicidin. These toxic antibiotics bind to the ATP synthase in mitochondria, inhibiting both ATP synthesis and the transfer of electrons through the chain of carriers to (Fig. 19-20b). As oligomycin does not interact with the electron carriers, it follows that electron transfer and ATP synthesis are obligately coupled: neither reaction occurs without the other.
Chemiosmotic theory readily explains the dependence of electron transfer on ATP synthesis in mitochondria. When the flow of protons into the matrix through the proton channel of ATP synthase is blocked (with oligomycin, for example), no path exists for the return of protons to the matrix, and the continued extrusion of protons driven by the activity of the respiratory chain generates a large proton gradient. The proton-motive force builds up until the cost (free energy) of pumping protons out of the matrix against this gradient equals or exceeds the energy released by the transfer of electrons from NADH to . At this point electron flow must stop; the free energy for the overall process of electron flow coupled to proton pumping becomes zero, and the system is at equilibrium.
Certain conditions and reagents, however, can uncouple oxidation from phosphorylation. When intact mitochondria are disrupted by treatment with detergent or by physical shear, the resulting membrane fragments can still catalyze electron transfer from succinate or NADH to , but no ATP synthesis is coupled to this respiration. Certain chemical compounds cause uncoupling without physically disrupting mitochondrial structure. Chemical uncouplers include 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) and carbonylcyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP) (Table 19-4; Fig. 19-21), weak acids with hydrophobic properties that permit them to diffuse readily across mitochondrial membranes. After entering the matrix in the protonated form, they can release a proton, thus dissipating the proton gradient. Resonance stabilization delocalizes the charge on the anionic forms, making them sufficiently hydrophobic to diffuse back across the membrane, where they can pick up a proton and repeat the process. Ionophores such as valinomycin (see Fig. 11-43) allow inorganic ions to pass easily through membranes. Ionophores uncouple electron transfer from oxidative phosphorylation by dissipating the electrical contribution to the electrochemical gradient across the mitochondrial membrane.
A prediction of the chemiosmotic theory is that, because the role of electron transfer in mitochondrial ATP synthesis is simply to pump protons to create the electrochemical potential of the proton-motive force, an artificially created proton gradient should be able to replace electron transfer in driving ATP synthesis. This has been experimentally confirmed (Fig. 19-22). In the absence of an oxidizable substrate, the proton-motive force alone suffices to drive ATP synthesis.
ATP Synthase Has Two Functional Domains, and
Mitochondrial ATP synthase is an F-type ATPase (see Fig. 11-40b) similar in structure and mechanism to the ATP synthases of bacteria and (as we will see in Chapter 20) chloroplasts. This large enzyme complex of the inner mitochondrial membrane catalyzes the formation of ATP from ADP and , driven by the flow of protons from the p to the n side of the membrane (Eqn 19-10). ATP synthase, also called Complex V to relate it to the electron-transfer complexes described in the last section, has two distinct components. These are , a peripheral membrane protein, and (o denoting oligomycin-sensitive), which is integral to the membrane. , the first factor recognized as essential for oxidative phosphorylation, was identified and purified by Efraim Racker and his colleagues in the early 1960s.
In the laboratory, small membrane vesicles formed from inner mitochondrial membranes carry out ATP synthesis coupled to electron transfer. When is gently extracted, the “stripped” vesicles still contain intact respiratory chains and the portion of ATP synthase. The vesicles can catalyze electron transfer from NADH to but cannot produce a proton gradient: has a proton pore through which protons leak as fast as they are pumped by electron transfer, and without a proton gradient the -depleted vesicles cannot make ATP. Isolated catalyzes ATP hydrolysis (the reversal of synthesis) and was therefore originally called ATPase. When purified is added back to the depleted vesicles, it reassociates with , plugging its proton pore and restoring the membrane’s capacity to couple electron transfer and ATP synthesis.
ATP Is Stabilized Relative to ADP on the Surface of
Isotope exchange experiments using purified reveal an extraordinary fact about the enzyme’s catalytic mechanism: on the enzyme surface, the reaction is readily reversible — the free-energy change for ATP synthesis is close to zero. When ATP is hydrolyzed by in the presence of -labeled water, the released contains an atom. Careful measurement of the content of formed in vitro by -catalyzed hydrolysis of ATP reveals that the has not one but three or four atoms (Fig. 19-23). This indicates that the terminal pyrophosphate bond in ATP is cleaved and re-formed repeatedly before leaves the enzyme surface. This exchange reaction occurs in unenergized complexes (with no proton gradient) and with isolated — the exchange does not require the input of energy.
Kinetic studies of the initial rates of ATP synthesis and hydrolysis confirm the conclusion that for ATP synthesis on the enzyme is near zero. From the measured rates of hydrolysis and synthesis , the calculated equilibrium constant for the reaction
is
From this , the calculated apparent is close to zero. This is much different from the of about for the hydrolysis of ATP free in solution (i.e., not on the enzyme surface).
What accounts for the huge difference? ATP synthase stabilizes ATP relative to by binding ATP more tightly, releasing enough energy to counterbalance the cost of making ATP. Careful measurements of the binding constants show that binds ATP with very high affinity and ADP with much lower affinity . The difference in corresponds to a difference of about 40 kJ/mol in binding energy, and this binding energy drives the equilibrium toward formation of the product ATP.
The Proton Gradient Drives the Release of ATP from the Enzyme Surface
Although ATP synthase equilibrates ATP with , in the absence of a proton gradient the newly synthesized ATP does not leave the surface of the enzyme. Effectively, the enzyme cannot turn over and synthesize a second molecule of ATP. It is the proton gradient that causes the enzyme to release the ATP formed on its surface. The reaction coordinate diagram of the process (Fig. 19-24) illustrates the difference between the mechanism of ATP synthase and that of many other enzymes that catalyze endergonic reactions.
For the continued synthesis of ATP, the enzyme must cycle between a form that binds ATP very tightly and a form that releases ATP. Chemical and crystallographic studies of the ATP synthase have revealed the structural basis for this alternation in function.
Each β Subunit of ATP Synthase Can Assume Three Different Conformations
Mitochondrial has nine subunits of five different types, with the composition . Each of the three β subunits has one catalytic site for ATP synthesis. The crystallographic determination of the structure by John E. Walker and colleagues revealed structural details that help explain the catalytic mechanism of the enzyme. The knoblike portion of is a flattened sphere, 8 nm by 10 nm, consisting of alternating α and β subunits arranged like the sections of an orange (Fig. 19-25a–d). Although the amino acid sequences of the three β subunits are identical, their conformations differ. The conformational differences extend to differences in their ATP/ADP-binding sites. When the protein is crystallized in the presence of ADP and App(NH)p, a close structural analog of ATP that cannot be hydrolyzed by the ATPase activity of , the binding site of one of the three β subunits is filled with App(NH)p, the second is filled with ADP, and the third is empty. The corresponding β subunit conformations are designated β-ATP, β-ADP, and β-empty (Fig. 19-25b). This difference in nucleotide binding among the three subunits is critical to the mechanism of the complex. The polypeptides that make up the stalk in the crystal structure are asymmetrically arranged. One domain of the single γ subunit makes up a central shaft that passes through . Another globular domain of γ helps to stabilize the β-empty conformation in a β subunit it is transiently associated with (Fig. 19-25c).
The complex, with its proton pore, is composed of three subunits, a, b, and c, in the proportion , where n ranges from 8 to 17, depending on the species. Subunit c is a small , very hydrophobic polypeptide, consisting almost entirely of two transmembrane helices, with a small loop extending from the matrix side of the membrane. The crystal structure of the yeast shows 10 c subunits, each with two transmembrane helices roughly perpendicular to the plane of the membrane and arranged in two concentric circles to create the c ring. The inner circle is made up of the amino-terminal helices of each c subunit; the outer circle, about 55 Å in diameter, is made up of the carboxyl-terminal helices. The c subunits in the c ring rotate together as a unit around an axis perpendicular to the membrane. The and γ subunits of form a leg-and-foot that projects from the bottom (membrane) side of and stands firmly on the ring of c subunits. The a subunit consists of several hydrophobic helices that span the membrane in close association with one of the c subunits in the c ring.
Rotational Catalysis Is Key to the Binding-Change Mechanism for ATP Synthesis
On the basis of detailed kinetic and binding studies of the reactions catalyzed by , Paul Boyer proposed a rotational catalysis mechanism in which the three active sites of take turns catalyzing ATP synthesis (Fig. 19-26). A given β subunit starts in the β-ADP conformation, which binds ADP and from the surrounding medium. The subunit now changes conformation, assuming the β-ATP form that tightly binds and stabilizes ATP, bringing about the ready equilibration of with ATP on the enzyme surface. Finally, the subunit changes to the β-empty conformation, which has very low affinity for ATP, and the newly synthesized ATP leaves the enzyme surface. Another round of catalysis begins when this subunit again assumes the β-ADP form and binds ADP and .
The conformational changes central to this mechanism are driven by the passage of protons through the portion of ATP synthase. The streaming of protons through the pore causes the c ring and the attached γ subunit to rotate about the long axis of γ, which is perpendicular to the plane of the membrane. The γ subunit passes through the center of the spheroid, which is held stationary relative to the membrane surface by the and subunits (Fig. 19-25a). With each rotation of 120°, γ comes into contact with a different β subunit, and the contact forces that β subunit into the β-empty conformation.
The three β subunits interact in such a way that when one assumes the β-empty conformation, its neighbor to one side must assume the β-ADP form, and the other neighbor the β-ATP form. Thus, one complete rotation of the γ subunit causes each β subunit to cycle through all three of its possible conformations, and for each rotation, three ATP are synthesized and released from the enzyme surface.
One strong prediction of this binding-change model is that the γ subunit should rotate in one direction when is synthesizing ATP and in the opposite direction when the enzyme is hydrolyzing ATP. This prediction of rotation with ATP hydrolysis was confirmed in elegant experiments in the laboratories of Masasuke Yoshida and Kazuhiko Kinosita, Jr. The rotation of γ in a single molecule was observed microscopically by attaching a long, thin, fluorescent actin polymer to γ and watching it move relative to immobilized on a microscope slide as ATP was hydrolyzed. (The expected reversal of the rotation when ATP is being synthesized could not be tested in this experiment; there is no proton gradient to drive ATP synthesis.) When the entire complex (not just ) was used in a similar experiment, the entire ring of c subunits rotated with γ (Fig. 19-27). The “shaft” rotated in the predicted direction through 360°. The rotation was not smooth but occurred in three discrete steps of 120°. As calculated from the known rate of ATP hydrolysis by one molecule and from the frictional drag on the long actin polymer, the efficiency of this mechanism in converting chemical energy into motion is close to 100%. It is, in Boyer’s words, “a splendid molecular machine!”
A model that illustrates how proton flow and rotary motion are coupled in the complex is shown in Figure 19-28. The a subunit is stationary, while the c ring rotates. Critical interactions occur between conserved amino acids in the a and c subunits. The individual subunits in the c ring are arranged in a circle with only a few in contact with the a subunit at any moment. Protons diffuse across the membrane through a path made up of both a and c subunits. Transient protonation of a key Glu residue in each c subunit elicits conformation changes that drive rotation and transmit protons between hydrophilic half channels positioned on each side of the membrane. The rotary movement of the c ring is made unidirectional by the large difference in proton concentration across the membrane. The number of protons that must be transferred to produce one complete rotation of the c ring is equal to the number of c subunits in the ring. Structural studies of the c ring have shown that the number of c subunits differs in different organisms (Fig. 19-29). In bovine mitochondria the number is 8, in yeast mitochondria and in Escherichia coli it is 10, and the number of c subunits can range as high as 17, as is seen in the soil bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei. The rate of rotation in intact mitochondria has been estimated at about 6,000 rpm — 100 rotations per second.
Chemiosmotic Coupling Allows Nonintegral Stoichiometries of Consumption and ATP Synthesis
The overall reaction equation for ATP synthesis has the following form:
(19-11)
The value of x is sometimes called the P/O ratio or the . When a proton gradient is coupled to ATP synthesis as described above, there is no theoretical requirement for to be integral. The relevant questions about stoichiometry become these: How many protons are pumped outward by electron transfer from one NADH to ? and How many protons must flow inward through the complex to drive the synthesis of one ATP? The measurement of proton fluxes is technically complicated; the investigator must take into account the buffering capacity of mitochondria, nonproductive leakage of protons across the inner membrane, and use of the proton gradient for functions other than ATP synthesis, such as driving the transport of substrates across the inner mitochondrial membrane (described below). When NADH or succinate (which sends electrons into the respiratory chain at the level of ubiquinone) is the oxidizable substrate, the consensus experimental values for number of protons pumped out per pair of electrons are 10 and 6, respectively. The most widely accepted experimental value for number of protons required to drive the synthesis of an ATP molecule is 4, of which 1 is used in transporting , ATP, and ADP across the mitochondrial membrane (see below). If 10 protons are pumped out per NADH and 4 must flow in to produce 1 ATP, the proton-based ratio is 2.5 for NADH as the electron donor and for succinate. However, as we will see in Worked Example 19-2, the proton stoichiometry of ATP synthesis by ATP synthase depends upon the number of c units in , which ranges from 8 to 17, depending on the species.
WORKED EXAMPLE 19-2 Stoichiometry of ATP Production: Effect of c Ring Size
(a) If the ATP synthase of bovine mitochondria has 8 c subunits per c ring, what is the predicted ratio of ATP formed per NADH oxidized? (b) What is the predicted value for yeast mitochondria, with 10 c subunits per ATP synthase? (c) What are the comparable values for electrons entering the respiratory chain from ?
SOLUTION:
(a) Here we are asked to determine how many ATP molecules are produced per NADH. This is another way of asking us to calculate the ratio, or x, in Equation 19-11. If the c ring has 8 c subunits, then one full rotation will transfer 8 protons to the matrix and produce 3 ATP molecules. But this synthesis also requires the transport of 3 into the matrix, at a cost of 1 proton each, adding 3 more protons to the total number required. This brings the total cost to . The generally agreed value for the number of protons pumped out per pair of electrons transferred from NADH is 10 (Eqn 19-7). So, oxidizing 1 NADH produces .
(b) If the c ring has 10 c subunits, then one full rotation will transfer 10 protons to the matrix and produce 3 ATP molecules. Adding in the 3 protons to transport the 3 into the matrix brings the total cost to . Oxidizing 1 NADH produces .
(c) When electrons enter the respiratory chain from (at ubiquinone), only 6 protons are available to drive ATP synthesis. This changes the calculation for bovine mitochondria to per pair of electrons from . For yeast mitochondria, the calculation is per pair of electrons from .
These calculated values of x, or the ratio, define a range that includes the experimental values of and , and we therefore use these values throughout this book.
The Proton-Motive Force Energizes Active Transport
Although the primary role of the proton gradient in mitochondria is to furnish energy for the synthesis of ATP, the proton-motive force also drives several transport processes essential to oxidative phosphorylation. The inner mitochondrial membrane is generally impermeable to charged species, but two specific systems transport ADP and into the matrix and ATP out to the cytosol (Fig. 19-30).
The adenine nucleotide translocase, integral to the inner membrane, binds in the intermembrane space and transports it into the matrix in exchange for an molecule simultaneously transported outward (see Fig. 13-11 for the ionic forms of ATP and ADP). Because this antiporter moves four negative charges out for every three moved in, its activity is favored by the transmembrane electrochemical gradient, which gives the matrix a net negative charge; the proton-motive force drives ATP-ADP exchange. Adenine nucleotide translocase is specifically inhibited by atractyloside, a toxic glycoside produced by a species of thistle. If the transport of ADP into and ATP out of mitochondria is inhibited, cytosolic ATP cannot be regenerated from ADP, explaining the toxicity of atractyloside.
A second membrane transport system essential to oxidative phosphorylation is the phosphate translocase, which promotes symport of one and one into the matrix. This transport process, too, is favored by the transmembrane proton gradient (Fig. 19-30). Notice that the process requires movement of one proton from the p side to the n side of the inner membrane, consuming some of the energy of electron transfer. A complex of the ATP synthase and both translocases, the ATP synthasome, can be isolated from mitochondria by gentle dissection with detergents, suggesting that the functions of these three proteins are very tightly integrated.
ATP and ADP cross the outer mitochondrial membrane via the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC), a 19-stranded β barrel with an opening about 27 Å wide, connecting the cytosol and the intermembrane space. Each VDAC, when open, can move ATP molecules per second. The opening is gated by voltage, as its name indicates, and under some conditions VDAC is closed to ATP.
Shuttle Systems Indirectly Convey Cytosolic NADH into Mitochondria for Oxidation
The NADH dehydrogenase of the inner mitochondrial membrane of animal cells can accept electrons only from NADH in the matrix. Given that the inner membrane is not permeable to NADH, how can the NADH generated by glycolysis in the cytosol be reoxidized to by via the respiratory chain? Special shuttle systems carry reducing equivalents from cytosolic NADH into mitochondria by an indirect route. The most active NADH shuttle, which functions in liver, kidney, and heart mitochondria, is the malate-aspartate shuttle (Fig. 19-31). The reducing equivalents of cytosolic NADH are first transferred to cytosolic oxaloacetate to yield malate, catalyzed by cytosolic malate dehydrogenase. The malate thus formed passes through the inner membrane via the malate–α-ketoglutarate transporter. Within the matrix, the reducing equivalents are passed to by the action of matrix malate dehydrogenase, forming NADH; this NADH can pass electrons directly to the respiratory chain. About 2.5 molecules of ATP are generated as this pair of electrons passes to . Cytosolic oxaloacetate must be regenerated by transamination reactions and the activity of membrane transporters to start another cycle of the shuttle.
Skeletal muscle and brain use a different NADH shuttle, the glycerol 3-phosphate shuttle (Fig. 19-32). It differs from the malate-aspartate shuttle in that it delivers the reducing equivalents from NADH through FAD in glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase to ubiquinone and thus into Complex III, not Complex I (Fig. 19-15), providing enough energy to synthesize only 1.5 ATP molecules per pair of electrons.
The mitochondria of plants have an externally oriented NADH dehydrogenase that can transfer electrons directly from cytosolic NADH into the respiratory chain at the level of ubiquinone. Because this pathway bypasses the NADH dehydrogenase of Complex I and the associated proton movement, the yield of ATP from cytosolic NADH is less than that from NADH generated in the matrix (Box 19-1).
SUMMARY 19.2 ATP Synthesis
The chemiosmotic theory describes the coupling of ATP synthesis to an electrochemical proton gradient. The flow of electrons through Complexes I, III, and IV results in pumping of protons across the inner mitochondrial membrane, making the matrix alkaline relative to the intermembrane space. This proton gradient provides the energy, in the form of the proton-motive force, for ATP synthesis from ADP and .
ATP synthase has two major components, called and . Both components have multiple subunits. The overall complex spans the inner mitochondrial membrane.
ATP synthesis is reversible within the active site on the β subunits of the complex. Very tight binding to ATP offsets the negative for ATP hydrolysis in solution.
Release of ATP from ATP synthase is promoted by the transmembrane proton gradient.
The subunits of the complex cycle from –bound to ATP-bound to empty conformations.
ATP synthase carries out “rotational catalysis,” in which the flow of protons through causes the c ring to rotate and in turn trigger the subunit conformational changes in .
The ratio of ATP synthesized per reduced to (the ratio) is about 2.5 when electrons enter the respiratory chain at Complex I, and 1.5 when electrons enter at ubiquinone. This ratio varies among species, depending on the number of c subunits in the complex.
Energy conserved in a proton gradient can drive solute transport uphill across a membrane.
The inner mitochondrial membrane is impermeable to NADH and , but NADH equivalents are moved from the cytosol to the matrix by either of two shuttles. NADH equivalents moved in by the malate-aspartate shuttle enter the respiratory chain at Complex I and yield a ratio of 2.5; those moved in by the glycerol 3-phosphate shuttle enter at ubiquinone and give a ratio of 1.5.